From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25867 invoked by alias); 11 May 2007 19:33:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 25858 invoked by uid 22791); 11 May 2007 19:33:11 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 May 2007 19:33:09 +0000 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28EE4B267; Fri, 11 May 2007 14:33:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDDF54B262; Fri, 11 May 2007 14:33:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1HmarS-0001pT-A9; Fri, 11 May 2007 15:33:06 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 19:33:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: Emi SUZUKI , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc] [2/4] SPU overlay support: The SPU target part Message-ID: <20070511193306.GA7017@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ulrich Weigand , Emi SUZUKI , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20070511173213.GC22529@caradoc.them.org> <200705111909.l4BJ9SKO022937@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200705111909.l4BJ9SKO022937@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg00209.txt.bz2 On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 09:09:28PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > The return stub isn't on the stack either. We'd have to manufacture > an extra zero-sized stack frame between caller and callee, with > special unwind rules to be able to continue the backtrace. I guess > this would be possible somehow, but I still don't see that this would > provide any benefit to most users ... Oh... I see how it works now. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery