From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5155 invoked by alias); 11 May 2007 19:00:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 5143 invoked by uid 22791); 11 May 2007 19:00:52 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 May 2007 19:00:46 +0000 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ABA94B267; Fri, 11 May 2007 14:00:44 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3634B262; Fri, 11 May 2007 14:00:44 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1HmaM7-0001S4-Q0; Fri, 11 May 2007 15:00:43 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 19:00:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc] [4/4] SPU overlay support: Bugfix in remove_breakpoint Message-ID: <20070511190043.GA5499@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20070511172943.GB22529@caradoc.them.org> <200705111855.l4BIt8oB016684@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200705111855.l4BIt8oB016684@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg00206.txt.bz2 On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 08:55:08PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > I guess we can implement that once we have a target that actually > supports this particular overlay mode. Fine with me. Since you have what seems to be the only actively maintained toolchain using the overlay support, we do it whatever way is more convenient for SPU until we need the generality :-) -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery