From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7467 invoked by alias); 11 May 2007 07:34:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 7459 invoked by uid 22791); 11 May 2007 07:34:40 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from imx12.toshiba.co.jp (HELO imx12.toshiba.co.jp) (61.202.160.132) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 May 2007 07:34:36 +0000 Received: from wall11.toshiba.co.jp (wall11 [133.199.90.149]) by imx12.toshiba.co.jp with ESMTP id l4B7Y7bN016911; Fri, 11 May 2007 16:34:07 +0900 (JST) Received: (from root@localhost) by wall11.toshiba.co.jp id l4B7Y7r7003870; Fri, 11 May 2007 16:34:07 +0900 (JST) Received: from ovp11.toshiba.co.jp [133.199.90.148] by wall11.toshiba.co.jp with ESMTP id SAA03850; Fri, 11 May 2007 16:34:06 +0900 Received: from mx11.toshiba.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ovp11.toshiba.co.jp with ESMTP id l4B7Y5Lr007480; Fri, 11 May 2007 16:34:05 +0900 (JST) Received: from mx.tjsys.co.jp by toshiba.co.jp id l4B7Y5nn005731; Fri, 11 May 2007 16:34:05 +0900 (JST) Received: from is-com10 (IDENT:U2FsdGVkX19lSl6YvmIofk3d5IQuP/Ab3ZL4ffjSs78@filtering.tjsys.co.jp [157.79.3.71]) by mx.tjsys.co.jp (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id l4B7Y54K004929; Fri, 11 May 2007 16:34:05 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost ([157.79.51.61]) by ims.tjsys.co.jp (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.10 (built Dec 26 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JHV00CUG90PXY@ims.tjsys.co.jp>; Fri, 11 May 2007 16:34:01 +0900 (JST) Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 07:34:00 -0000 From: Emi SUZUKI Subject: Re: [RFC] "single step" atomic instruction sequences as a whole on PPC In-reply-to: <200705102258.l4AMwSF4026578@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> To: uweigand@de.ibm.com Cc: drow@false.org, jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Message-id: <20070511.163447.207580884.emi-suzuki@tjsys.co.jp> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.0.90 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Content-type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit References: <20070510213624.GA2822@caradoc.them.org> <200705102258.l4AMwSF4026578@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> X-WAuditID: 0705111634010000008247 X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg00183.txt.bz2 Ulrich, I tried this one and am sure it was solved. Thanks! I hope this will solve Jan's issue also. From: Ulrich Weigand Subject: Re: [RFC] "single step" atomic instruction sequences as a whole on PPC Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 00:58:28 +0200 (CEST) > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > Maybe it would be more elegant to anticipate the day that single step > > breakpoints are completely normal: make breakpoint_inserted_here_p > > check them? This is already the only caller. > > Good point. Something like the patch below? I've also added the > check to software_breakpoint_inserted_here_p; that seemed to make > more sense that not. -- Emi SUZUKI / emi-suzuki at tjsys.co.jp