From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10104 invoked by alias); 9 May 2007 18:12:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 10089 invoked by uid 22791); 9 May 2007 18:12:15 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 May 2007 18:12:11 +0000 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C9A4B267; Wed, 9 May 2007 13:12:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3935E4B262; Wed, 9 May 2007 13:12:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Hlqdy-0001hr-Tz; Wed, 09 May 2007 14:12:07 -0400 Date: Wed, 09 May 2007 18:12:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Luis Machado Cc: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] "single step" atomic instruction sequences as a whole on PPC Message-ID: <20070509181206.GA6543@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Luis Machado , Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200705091433.l49EXOfG024847@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <1178733926.4754.1.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1178733926.4754.1.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg00133.txt.bz2 On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 03:05:26PM -0300, Luis Machado wrote: > > Could you implement and test a patch to fix this, please? > > Sure, no problem. I will update the patch, test and re-subtmit when it's > ready. Does Ulrich's observation imply that there is no test case for this neat feature? I would recommend one in gdb.arch (and maybe a NEWS entry too). -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery