From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20417 invoked by alias); 8 May 2007 02:36:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 20409 invoked by uid 22791); 8 May 2007 02:36:42 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 May 2007 02:36:40 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l482acQ1009344 for ; Mon, 7 May 2007 22:36:38 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l482ac3X027232 for ; Mon, 7 May 2007 22:36:38 -0400 Received: from ironwood.lan (vpn-14-134.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.134]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l482acAb030560 for ; Mon, 7 May 2007 22:36:38 -0400 Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 02:36:00 -0000 From: Kevin Buettner To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] legacy_virtual_frame_pointer: SP_REGNUM might be a pseudo-register Message-ID: <20070507193637.377baf23@ironwood.lan> In-Reply-To: <20070507233139.GA19101@caradoc.them.org> References: <20070507144824.1110b520@ironwood.lan> <20070507233139.GA19101@caradoc.them.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.10.4; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-05/txt/msg00109.txt.bz2 On Mon, 7 May 2007 19:31:39 -0400 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 02:48:24PM -0700, Kevin Buettner wrote: > > Any comments on the patch below? > > > > I found this change necessary to avoid internal errors in some gdb.trace > > tests when running against the mips simulator. > > > > * arch-utils.c (legacy_virtual_frame_pointer): SP_REGNUM might > > be a pseudo-register; revise test accordingly. > > In addition to what Ulrich said, I'm planning to make SP_REGNUM into a > real register on MIPS; last week I did a first set of patches in this > direction and I hope to continue. Okay, patch withdrawn. Thanks, Kevin