From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6271 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2007 18:43:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 6253 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Apr 2007 18:43:58 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtagate8.de.ibm.com (HELO mtagate8.de.ibm.com) (195.212.29.157) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:43:56 +0100 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate8.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3UIhrn6320306 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 18:43:53 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l3UIhr613199158 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:43:53 +0200 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l3UIhrLn002114 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:43:53 +0200 Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.85.9]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id l3UIhqrP002111; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:43:52 +0200 Message-Id: <200704301843.l3UIhqrP002111@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Received: by tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:43:52 +0200 Subject: Re: [rfc] dwarf2 unwinder and MIPS n32 To: drow@false.org (Daniel Jacobowitz) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 20:19:00 -0000 From: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20070430132613.GD25539@caradoc.them.org> from "Daniel Jacobowitz" at Apr 30, 2007 09:26:13 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg00422.txt.bz2 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > Well then, how about we add one? Your mention of symmetry is I think > very important; we have a lot of different ways to manipulate longs / > addresses, and I'd rather reduce than increase the number, but the > first step is to make the interfaces we have consistent. > > Tested on mips64-linux N32, where it still fixes the problem; unlike > the previous patch, this one should not break segmented architectures > that need to adjust pointers and addresses. Looks good to me ... Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com