Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Luis Machado <luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
		gdb-patches ml <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Detecting and printing 128-bit long double values for PPC
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 16:49:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070428162752.GA13329@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200704281624.l3SGOEJZ032044@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>

On Sat, Apr 28, 2007 at 06:24:14PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> We have the same situation on s390, where we switched from 64-bit to
> 128-bit long double a while ago.  Like PowerPC, there is currently no
> way to recognize how a binary was built ...
> 
> While an ABI marker might be a good idea in the future, we're stuck
> with the situation right now that many unmarked 128-bit long double
> binaries are already out there (e.g. all of SLES 10 and RHEL 5),
> and we really should be able to debug those properly.
> 
> Thus I'm wondering whether we shouldn't have a reasonable default
> for unmarked binaries, presumably based on the system compiler
> defaults detected at configure time for native builds, and then
> provide a command allowing the user to override that default?

Well, that's pretty much what I did for our customer who reported the
equivalent problem with PowerPC -msoft-float; except instead of
detecting it at configure time I added a manual configure option
(since this was for a cross-debugger).

But it doesn't really scale... I'm open to better ideas...

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-28 16:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-28 14:08 Luis Machado
2007-04-28 16:19 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-04-28 16:27   ` Ulrich Weigand
2007-04-28 16:49     ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2007-04-28 23:47       ` Luis Machado
2007-04-30 12:28         ` Ulrich Weigand
2007-04-30 12:41           ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-04-30 13:15             ` Luis Machado
2007-04-30 13:19               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-04-30 13:51                 ` Luis Machado
2007-04-30 13:53                   ` Luis Machado
2007-04-30 14:12                   ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-05-06 21:36                     ` Ulrich Weigand
2007-05-06 22:17                       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-08-31 18:15                         ` Luis Machado
2007-08-31 18:27                           ` Joseph S. Myers
2007-04-30 18:03                 ` Luis Machado
2007-04-30 13:08           ` Luis Machado

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070428162752.GA13329@caradoc.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox