From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26795 invoked by alias); 27 Apr 2007 22:47:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 26787 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Apr 2007 22:47:40 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:47:38 +0100 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 106E44B267; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:47:37 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2924B262; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:47:36 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1HhZE0-0003HU-4M; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:47:36 -0400 Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 05:38:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Kevin Buettner Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC] dwarf2_read_address(): sign extend as appropriate Message-ID: <20070427224736.GA12595@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Kevin Buettner , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20070420163312.56701614@ironwood.lan> <200704231505.l3NF5KV5025451@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <20070423094900.15a047d2@ironwood.lan> <20070423165646.GA15110@caradoc.them.org> <20070423140642.3920579e@ironwood.lan> <20070424181308.GA26543@caradoc.them.org> <20070427141018.1430725b@ironwood.lan> <20070427214829.GA21596@caradoc.them.org> <20070427154147.38dcfae2@ironwood.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070427154147.38dcfae2@ironwood.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg00368.txt.bz2 On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 03:41:47PM -0700, Kevin Buettner wrote: > I think we do have some other old MIPS patches lying about. (I am not > the author of all of them.) I'll make an effort to go through them > early next week and post the ones that still seem relevant. Thanks. I may have some Monday myself, if today's testing goes well. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery