From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9871 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2007 16:57:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 9863 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Apr 2007 16:57:00 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 17:56:50 +0100 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCBDC4B267 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:56:48 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA2E34B262 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:56:48 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Hg1qJ-0003xJ-Gp for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:56:47 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 18:19:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] dwarf2_read_address(): sign extend as appropriate Message-ID: <20070423165646.GA15110@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20070420163312.56701614@ironwood.lan> <200704231505.l3NF5KV5025451@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> <20070423094900.15a047d2@ironwood.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070423094900.15a047d2@ironwood.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg00311.txt.bz2 On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 09:49:00AM -0700, Kevin Buettner wrote: > We can't use address_from_register() in this instance since > dwarf2_read_address() is not fetching an address from a register, but > rather from some DWARF2 info. How about value_as_address? I don't like the need for another call site for gdbarch_integer_to_address; it's historically tricky... -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery