From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17257 invoked by alias); 17 Apr 2007 15:02:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 17248 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Apr 2007 15:02:37 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 16:02:33 +0100 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5BBC4B267 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:02:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875644B262 for ; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 10:02:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HdpCS-000867-6h for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 11:02:32 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 15:42:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [rfc/rft] [0/5] Untangle register_addr et. al. Message-ID: <20070417150232.GA31113@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <200704142107.l3EL7SZn007059@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200704142107.l3EL7SZn007059@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg00257.txt.bz2 On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 11:07:27PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > However, as I don't have access to the majority of the affected native > targets, I'd appreciate any volunteers to test test patch set, in > particular on mips-linux and alpha-linux. I haven't looked through the patches yet, but after a bit of a struggle I've tested them; the differences on mips-linux are in the noise. (mips-linux test results are not great at the moment, but not awful either; the signal and threading tests are doing poorly.) -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery