From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31874 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2007 16:14:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 31864 invoked by uid 22791); 14 Apr 2007 16:14:05 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 17:14:03 +0100 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19F74B267; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 11:14:00 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA544B262; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 11:13:56 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Hckss-0006Oe-Fz; Sat, 14 Apr 2007 12:13:54 -0400 Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 16:19:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Vladimir Prus Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Ping: frozen variable objects Message-ID: <20070414161353.GA24574@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Prus , Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200703251351.43195.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200704111843.43991.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200704141353.51962.vladimir@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200704141353.51962.vladimir@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg00217.txt.bz2 On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 01:53:51PM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote: > @item > The range of values for fields with specified values, e.g., > -@code{in_scope} (@pxref{-var-update}) may be extended. > +@code{in_scope} (@pxref{-var-update-fields}) may be extended. Doesn't that read a little odd to you? I'd think '-var-update fields' at least. Thanks! -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery