From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5347 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2007 13:57:18 -0000 Received: (qmail 5335 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Apr 2007 13:57:18 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:57:13 +0100 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DD624B270; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:57:11 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024244B26F; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:57:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HcMH0-0003HS-9E; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:57:10 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 14:04:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Eli Zaretskii , sje@cup.hp.com, gdb-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Patch for gdb build on hppa hp-ux Message-ID: <20070413135710.GC12300@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , sje@cup.hp.com, gdb-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <20070409021338.GA28612@caradoc.them.org> <200704092325.QAA13441@hpsje.cup.hp.com> <20070410120547.GB18255@caradoc.them.org> <20070410202213.GA778@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070410202213.GA778@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg00200.txt.bz2 On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 04:22:13PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 10:03:27PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > + SOM-encapsulated symbolic debugging information, automatic > > > + invocation of pxdb, and the aCC custom C++ ABI. > > > > This is not a complete sentence. Since you approved similar descriptive items in the other deletion patch, I checked this in with only the Itanium correction. Please let me know if you'd like me to change it. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery