From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1040 invoked by alias); 12 Apr 2007 20:48:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 1032 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Apr 2007 20:48:30 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:48:27 +0100 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E2B4B267; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:48:26 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E2C74B262; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:48:26 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Hc6DQ-000285-Sg; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:48:24 -0400 Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:48:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] "single step" atomic instruction sequences as a whole. Message-ID: <20070412204824.GA8168@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20070412182542.GA937@caradoc.them.org> <200704122009.l3CK9Agl030348@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200704122009.l3CK9Agl030348@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg00179.txt.bz2 On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 10:09:10PM +0200, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > I thought "resume" (where this is called) too low-level for > a frame to make sense. You cannot single-step anywhere but > in the innermost frame, so a regcache seemed more appropriate. > (How would I actually get hold of a frame in resume?) I guess you'd just use the current one, but a regcache is fine too. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery