From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24188 invoked by alias); 11 Apr 2007 14:52:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 24179 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Apr 2007 14:52:14 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:52:05 +0100 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 494EA4B267; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:52:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C144B262; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 09:52:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HbeB1-0005eV-D9; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:52:03 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:52:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Ping: frozen variable objects Message-ID: <20070411145203.GA21413@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200703251351.43195.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20070410190335.GA22313@caradoc.them.org> <200704111843.43991.vladimir@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200704111843.43991.vladimir@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg00144.txt.bz2 On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 06:43:43PM +0400, Vladimir Prus wrote: > Wierd, that docs were in previous patch. I've revived them now. Thanks. Eli, when you have a moment, could you look at this more complete documentation patch? Other than that the patch is OK. You might want to double-check that the ChangeLog entry still matches the patch - I noticed the mi-support.exp bits were wrong. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery