From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2836 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2007 17:41:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 2827 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Apr 2007 17:41:37 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 18:41:30 +0100 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598FB4B267; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:41:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 370884B262; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 12:41:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HbKLQ-0005Z0-5J; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 13:41:28 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:41:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Steve Ellcey Cc: gdb-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Patch for gdb build on hppa hp-ux Message-ID: <20070410174128.GA21372@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Steve Ellcey , gdb-patches@gcc.gnu.org References: <20070410120547.GB18255@caradoc.them.org> <200704101732.KAA16745@hpsje.cup.hp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200704101732.KAA16745@hpsje.cup.hp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-09) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg00094.txt.bz2 On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 10:32:07AM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote: > > +Support for the HP aCC compiler on HP-UX/PA-RISC > > + > > + SOM-encapsulated symbolic debugging information, automatic > > + invocation of pxdb, and the aCC custom C++ ABI. This does not > > + affect HP-UX for Itanic or GCC for HP-UX/PA-RISC. Code compiled > > + with aCC can still be debugged on an assembly level. > > + > > I would prefer you say IA64 or Itanium and not Itanic. Whoops, thank you. I even looked it up and worked out that I should say Itanium, and then forgot to fix it. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery