From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17762 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2007 08:24:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 17752 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Apr 2007 08:24:43 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 06 Apr 2007 09:24:39 +0100 Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l368O9P0017618; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 10:24:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.14.0/8.14.0/Submit) id l368O8pv013695; Fri, 6 Apr 2007 10:24:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 08:24:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200704060824.l368O8pv013695@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: ghost@cs.msu.su CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: (message from Vladimir Prus on Fri, 06 Apr 2007 10:06:24 +0400) Subject: Re: "target remote | " stderr -- try2 References: <200703251735.13369.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <20070329180627.GD28418@caradoc.them.org> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2 > From: Vladimir Prus > Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 10:06:24 +0400 > > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 04:35:13PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote: > >> > >> This is a revision of my earlier patch to make > >> stderr output from program run with > >> > >> target remote | some_program > >> > >> to be routed through gdb_stderr, so that MI > >> frontend sees that output. > >> > >> The original patch is at: > >> > >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gdb.patches/32540 > >> > >> and this version differs by not having any #ifdef WIN32 inside > >> ser-base.c, but instead using new method in 'struct serial_ops', > >> that is initialized in ser-mingw.c. > >> > >> OK? > > > > This version is OK. Thanks! > > Doh! It turns out I've attached a patch that won't even compile. > Although the difference to the real patch is trivial, for avoidance > of doubt I attach the "right" patch and the delta to the previous > one. Is this version OK? I like this version a lot better than the one with #ifdef WIN32. Thanks Volodya, for taking the trouble to clean things up. Mark