From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8818 invoked by alias); 2 Apr 2007 06:59:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 8798 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Apr 2007 06:59:04 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Apr 2007 07:59:00 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FCDC48D001; Mon, 2 Apr 2007 02:58:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 06129-02; Mon, 2 Apr 2007 02:58:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from joel.gnat.com (unknown [70.71.0.212]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A0A48CFF8; Mon, 2 Apr 2007 02:58:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: by joel.gnat.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 07FABE7B43; Mon, 2 Apr 2007 00:00:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2007 06:59:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Enhance stabs reader to better deal with forward references Message-ID: <20070402070011.GC3963@adacore.com> References: <20070209194107.GA3365@adacore.com> <20070227165003.GB31729@caradoc.them.org> <20070228201201.GH13140@adacore.com> <20070327162947.GC3452@caradoc.them.org> <20070329183609.GA3737@adacore.com> <460EC794.2080309@portugalmail.pt> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <460EC794.2080309@portugalmail.pt> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-04/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2 Pedro, > Unfortunatelly, this patch broke Cygwin, which still uses stabs by default. > > I am getting a SIGSEGV while issuing a breakpoint. Thanks for the report, and sorry about that. Unfortunately, I won't have much time in the next two or three days - I might be able to understand what is actually from the backtrace and your patch, but it might not be sufficient. And if you have an opportunity to investigate a bit more, that would be very much appreciated. In the meantime, feel free to back the patch out if necessary. -- Joel