From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10648 invoked by alias); 30 Mar 2007 21:13:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 10629 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Mar 2007 21:13:35 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 22:13:31 +0100 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A8514B267; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 16:13:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C56C4B262; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 16:13:29 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HXOPY-0000m2-J1; Fri, 30 Mar 2007 17:13:28 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 21:13:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Jim Blandy Cc: Mark Kettenis , eliz@gnu.org, denis.pilat@st.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] gdb is broken: missing signal.h checking Message-ID: <20070330211328.GA2960@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Jim Blandy , Mark Kettenis , eliz@gnu.org, denis.pilat@st.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <460BD630.20709@st.com> <19115.212.123.203.30.1175190093.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> <20070329174808.GA28084@caradoc.them.org> <20070330121226.GB7415@caradoc.them.org> <200703301853.l2UIrTSg009986@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070330190106.GA28397@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14+cvs20070313 (2007-03-13) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg00372.txt.bz2 On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 02:04:37PM -0700, Jim Blandy wrote: > > Does this mean we can put variable declarations after statements now? > I love being able to declare iteration variables before loops. That's C99, not ISO C90 :-) -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery