From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14300 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2007 19:52:43 -0000 Received: (qmail 14280 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Mar 2007 19:52:43 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 20:52:32 +0100 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8984B267; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:52:31 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E9A4B262; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:52:31 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HX0fd-0005g7-Fz; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:52:29 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:52:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: Pedro Alves Subject: Re: Remove old WinCE support. Message-ID: <20070329195229.GA19477@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Pedro Alves References: <460B280F.90908@portugalmail.pt> <20070329180035.GC28418@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070329180035.GC28418@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14+cvs20070313 (2007-03-13) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg00326.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 02:00:35PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 03:44:31AM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > > Note: Completely untested. Too late for that today - will try tomorrow, > > but it should be pretty obvious. > > It looks fine, but I'd like at least a minimal amount of testing. > Maybe build a couple of cross GDBs and test that they aren't > completely broken. > > Could you also add an obsolete stanza in configure.tgt, like the one > in bfd/config.bfd? Actually, just add them to the one I'm about to check in, instead. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery