From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2295 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2007 18:56:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 2282 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Mar 2007 18:56:14 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:56:04 +0100 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 478E44B267; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:56:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C8F4B262; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:56:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HWzn0-0004tW-LF; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:56:02 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:56:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA/DWARF] variables with no DW_AT_location Message-ID: <20070329185602.GF28418@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20070328222253.GM3866@adacore.com> <20070329022031.GA17225@caradoc.them.org> <20070329184244.GB3737@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070329184244.GB3737@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14+cvs20070313 (2007-03-13) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg00324.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 11:42:44AM -0700, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > Is this patch coming from an older tree? Because dwarf2read doesn't > > do that any more. > > Argh!!! Certain files in my tree had weird tags, and I have no idea > why. I made a clean check out of the sources, and now I see: > > Address of symbol "noloc" is unknown. > > Thanks for catching this, and sorry for the trouble. > Should we still keep the testcase, though? (revised) > > 2007-03-29 Joel Brobecker > > * gdb.dwarf2/dw2-noloc.S: New file. > * gdb.dwarf2/dw2-noloc.exp: New file. OK, thanks. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery