From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 382 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2007 18:55:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 363 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Mar 2007 18:55:09 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:55:03 +0100 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF3B64B267; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:55:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A58D34B262; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:55:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HWzm0-0004sK-UE; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:55:00 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:55:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: TUI + gdbserver broken? Message-ID: <20070329185500.GE28418@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Pedro Alves , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20070319221430.GA24326@caradoc.them.org> <45FF1571.2080401@portugalmail.pt> <20070319234141.GA29137@caradoc.them.org> <45FF2D16.6030501@portugalmail.pt> <20070320025548.GA6238@caradoc.them.org> <4053daab0703200205r462e7501x771fa8a0d1a91ebf@mail.gmail.com> <46006BF5.8020907@portugalmail.pt> <4601EF14.4080103@portugalmail.pt> <20070327201536.GP28164@caradoc.them.org> <460ADA2B.60301@portugalmail.pt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <460ADA2B.60301@portugalmail.pt> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14+cvs20070313 (2007-03-13) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg00323.txt.bz2 On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 10:12:11PM +0100, Pedro Alves wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > >Could you see if the attached works for you? > Perfectly - fixes both the "Remote communication error", and > the extra refreshes. Great. I checked it in. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery