From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1363 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2007 18:06:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 1333 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Mar 2007 18:06:37 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 19:06:30 +0100 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E0C4B267; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:06:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 405EF4B262; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:06:28 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HWz11-0007bU-Sf; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:06:27 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:06:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: "target remote | " stderr -- try2 Message-ID: <20070329180627.GD28418@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Vladimir Prus , gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <200703251735.13369.vladimir@codesourcery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200703251735.13369.vladimir@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14+cvs20070313 (2007-03-13) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg00320.txt.bz2 On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 04:35:13PM +0300, Vladimir Prus wrote: > > This is a revision of my earlier patch to make > stderr output from program run with > > target remote | some_program > > to be routed through gdb_stderr, so that MI > frontend sees that output. > > The original patch is at: > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gdb.patches/32540 > > and this version differs by not having any #ifdef WIN32 inside > ser-base.c, but instead using new method in 'struct serial_ops', > that is initialized in ser-mingw.c. > > OK? This version is OK. Thanks! -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery