From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10626 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2007 17:48:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 10572 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Mar 2007 17:48:18 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:48:11 +0100 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E7864B267; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:48:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C9CC4B262; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:48:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HWyjI-0007MB-Td; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:48:08 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:48:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Kettenis Cc: Denis PILAT , gdb-patches Subject: Re: [RFA] gdb is broken: missing signal.h checking Message-ID: <20070329174808.GA28084@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , Denis PILAT , gdb-patches References: <460BD630.20709@st.com> <19115.212.123.203.30.1175190093.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <19115.212.123.203.30.1175190093.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14+cvs20070313 (2007-03-13) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg00315.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 07:41:33PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > On my native linux gdb, I get "warning: Signal ? does not exist on this > > system." when running. > > It's just a missing line in the configure of gdb. > > signal.h is ISO C; we don't support systems that do not have it. It turns out that this file is compiled for both GDB and gdbserver (a long ago decision to try to reduce code duplication... I'm not completely sure it was worth the hassle). GDB definitely does not support systems without , but gdbserver now tries to. I missed the problem when we just added WinCE support. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery