From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16289 invoked by alias); 29 Mar 2007 17:25:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 16259 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Mar 2007 17:25:22 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from return.false.org (HELO return.false.org) (66.207.162.98) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:25:14 +0100 Received: from return.false.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088EF4B267; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:25:13 -0500 (CDT) Received: from caradoc.them.org (dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.172.95]) by return.false.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A564B262; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:25:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HWyN6-0006zp-1a; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 13:25:12 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:25:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Dwayne Grant McConnell Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Breakpoints with multiple locations? Message-ID: <20070329172511.GA26838@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Dwayne Grant McConnell , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20070328025825.GA11307@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14+cvs20070313 (2007-03-13) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg00313.txt.bz2 On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 12:19:07PM -0500, Dwayne Grant McConnell wrote: > > No one is working on it at the moment that I am aware of, but I remain > > interested in the problem. > > Do you have any suggestions on how I get started? Are there any partial patches > out there? Any email threads in particular which I should review? The last work I did on this was a long time ago: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2005-03/msg00195.html I don't know if it will still be helpful. You'll see that I skipped all the parts which require significant additional design or interface. That's the thing we need next :-) Well, that and seeing if the code still works. gdb@ may be a more suitable list, since this isn't yet a patch, but it doesn't make a lot of difference - the same people read both, more or less. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery