From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Testcase problem in chng-syms.exp
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 00:22:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200703100022.l2A0Mleb030342@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> (raw)
Hello,
I'm seeing failures in chng-sym.exp which appear to be test case bugs.
The output of GDB near the end of the test run is:
Executing on host: spu-gcc /home/uweigand/fsf/gdb-head/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/chng-syms.c -DVARIABLE=var2 -g -lm -o /home/uweig
and/fsf/gdb-head-build/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/chng-syms (timeout = 300)
run ^M
`/home/uweigand/fsf/gdb-head-build/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/chng-syms' has changed; re-reading symbols.^M
Error in re-setting breakpoint 1:^M
No symbol "var1" in current context.^M
Starting program: /home/uweigand/fsf/gdb-head-build/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/chng-syms ^M
^M
Program exited normally.^M
(gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/chng-syms.exp: running with invalidated bpt condition after executable changes
Now, the corresponding test case code reads:
gdb_run_cmd
gdb_expect {
-re "Error in re-setting .*No symbol .var1..*Program exited normally.*$gdb_prompt $" {
pass "running with invalidated bpt condition after executable changes"
}
-re "Error in re-setting .*No symbol .var1..*Breakpoint .*,( 0x.* in)? exit .*$gdb_prompt $" {
pass "running with invalidated bpt condition after executable changes"
}
-re "$gdb_prompt $" {
fail "running with invalidated bpt condition after executable changes"
}
timeout {
fail "(timeout) running with invalidated bpt condition after executable changes"
}
}
So you'd expect that the output would match the first pattern, right?
However, it doesn't. This appears to be caused by the implementation
of gdb_run_cmd, which ends in:
send_gdb "run $args\n"
# This doesn't work quite right yet.
gdb_expect 60 {
-re "The program .* has been started already.*y or n. $" {
send_gdb "y\n"
exp_continue
}
-re "Starting program: \[^\r\n\]*" {}
}
This means everything up to and including the line "Starting program: ..."
is swallowed up by this gdb_expect, and the second one in chng-syms.exp
does see the lines it is looking for any more.
Did I overlook anything here? How can we best fix this?
I'd appreciate any suggestions ...
Thanks,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com
next reply other threads:[~2007-03-10 0:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-03-10 0:22 Ulrich Weigand [this message]
2007-03-16 15:33 ` [committed] " Ulrich Weigand
2007-03-16 15:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200703100022.l2A0Mleb030342@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com \
--to=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox