From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7677 invoked by alias); 9 Mar 2007 01:02:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 7669 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Mar 2007 01:02:48 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:02:41 +0000 Received: from dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.172.95] helo=caradoc.them.org) by nevyn.them.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HPTVG-00029B-Cd; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:02:38 -0500 Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HPTVG-0001Wy-6T; Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:02:38 -0500 Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:02:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Ulrich Weigand Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [mi] Some error path fixes Message-ID: <20070309010238.GA5849@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ulrich Weigand , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20061207220013.GA9470@nevyn.them.org> <200703090055.l290tKxL022867@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200703090055.l290tKxL022867@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg00106.txt.bz2 I'm really not showing well today... :-( On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 01:55:20AM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > This fails on SPU, where address zero is indeed readable. I get: > > -var-create null_ptr * **0^M > ^done,name="null_ptr",numchild="0",value="",type="int"^M > (gdb) ^M > PASS: gdb.mi/mi-var-cmd.exp: create null_ptr > -var-update null_ptr^M > ^done,changelist=[]^M > (gdb) ^M > FAIL: gdb.mi/mi-var-cmd.exp: update null_ptr > > Note the completely empty changelist, while the test checks > for at least one element { ... }. > > Is this a testcase bug, or should there really be a change? I think you're right - the braces should be removed. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery