Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [rfc] Increase match_max size for GDB testsuite?
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 18:46:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070308184617.GA22903@caradoc.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200703081839.l28Id1ok029082@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>

On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 07:39:00PM +0100, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> I'm no dejagnu/expect expert, but seems to me there is a buffer size
> that is being set to 20000 in lib/gdb.exp, and if any response from
> the inferior exceeds this size, it's not completly predictable what
> happens.

I think that's accurate.

> Note that I've seen the same problem in the past with checkpoint.exp
> on s390x-ibm-linux (when retrieving the list of 600 checkpoints),
> so it doesn't appear to be a spu-only issue.
> 
> By simply increasing the "match_max" argument in default_gdb_init,
> those failures go away.  I didn't notice any adverse effects either,
> so I'd like to make that change -- however, if anybody has a better
> solution to the problem, please let me know ...

The checkpoint tests have a similar problem, but nowhere else should.
Basically, there are two ways you can approach large tests: you can
make the buffer bigger, and perform regex matching on an increasingly
huge output, or you can match one line at a time and use exp_continue.
One example of this is in auxv.exp.

I'd mildly prefer that approach - the big buffer can be very slow, and
it just means we'll be back to the problem again later if another
target has even more registers.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery


  reply	other threads:[~2007-03-08 18:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-08 18:39 Ulrich Weigand
2007-03-08 18:46 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2007-03-08 20:01   ` Ulrich Weigand
2007-03-08 20:05     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-03-08 20:10       ` Ulrich Weigand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070308184617.GA22903@caradoc.them.org \
    --to=drow@false.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox