From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26473 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2007 21:44:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 26423 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Mar 2007 21:44:38 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 21:44:33 +0000 Received: from dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.172.95] helo=caradoc.them.org) by nevyn.them.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HP3vx-0007La-RH; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:44:29 -0500 Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HP3vx-0006fH-6m; Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:44:29 -0500 Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 21:44:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA/mips(commit?)] Unwinding from noreturn function Message-ID: <20070307214429.GA25544@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20070307041643.GJ25742@adacore.com> <20070307122032.GB18998@caradoc.them.org> <20070307214228.GB18974@adacore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070307214228.GB18974@adacore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-03/txt/msg00080.txt.bz2 On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 01:42:28PM -0800, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Yep, I remembered. However, I also thought that your choice made sense. > I really think it does, but given: Yes, you're right - you could argue this either way. I suspect that to get it quite right you'd need both the in-block address and the PC. > I decided to revert your changes for now. Thanks. Looks good. > I'm also sad to report that I have been told to put off work on > mips-irix for a while. That was a personal initiative on my side, > but I'm lacking time at work, so this was the first task that got cut. > I hope someone else can find the time to bring it back to life... Oh, well. Thanks for your efforts - I certainly sympathize :-) -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery