From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30750 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2007 20:50:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 30742 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Feb 2007 20:50:28 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:50:17 +0000 Received: from dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.172.95] helo=caradoc.them.org) by nevyn.them.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HM9H1-0008Jj-QM; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:50:11 -0500 Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HM9H1-00068j-IE; Tue, 27 Feb 2007 15:50:11 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:50:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: brooks.moses@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [patch] Implement "make pdf" and "make install-pdf" targets. Message-ID: <20070227205011.GA23585@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , brooks.moses@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <45DE9FE6.8090507@codesourcery.com> <45DEB333.3040500@codesourcery.com> <20070227172818.GN31729@caradoc.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-02/txt/msg00353.txt.bz2 On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:37:09PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 12:28:18 -0500 > > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Eli Zaretskii > > > > I think these are both OK, unless Eli would like to take a look at > > them, as our documentation guru. > > > > Assuming Eli has no objections, should I commit these for you? > > I have no objections. The reason I didn't respond was that the bulk > of the change was about directories other than gdb, so I assumed, > perhaps mistakenly, that someone else needs to approve such a broad > change. No, I think you're generally correct (although you could actually do it yourself, if you were comfortable with the build system bits). Anyway, I wanted your opinion before I went ahead :-) I'll apply the patch later or tomorrow. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery