From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6523 invoked by alias); 25 Feb 2007 00:15:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 6515 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Feb 2007 00:15:26 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 00:15:18 +0000 Received: from dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.172.95] helo=caradoc.them.org) by nevyn.them.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HL72h-0003Xo-MT; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 19:15:07 -0500 Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HL72g-00048E-S2; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 19:15:06 -0500 Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 00:15:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Lerele Cc: Pedro Alves , Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [Patch] Win32 gdbserver new interrupt support, and attach to process fix. Message-ID: <20070225001506.GA15711@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Lerele , Pedro Alves , Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <45DF7E27.10102@champenstudios.com> <45E0376D.9010605@champenstudios.com> <45E05872.1040605@champenstudios.com> <45E0AB9E.9060107@portugalmail.pt> <45E0CA5A.1020005@champenstudios.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45E0CA5A.1020005@champenstudios.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-02/txt/msg00306.txt.bz2 On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 12:29:30AM +0100, Lerele wrote: > Thanks to you. > Nice to see it gets used. > I surely find it useful. It's just great to cross develop on Linux to > just use Windows as a target. 8-) Indeed! Sorry I haven't gotten back to you about the patch yet - I definitely will soon. > However, I don't know if people out there are using it, otherwise I > guess the attach bug should have been listed. > It isn't that strange to use the attach feature, is it? Well, I don't > use it really. hmmm. > Been taking a look ocasionally at gdb buglist, but didn't see any related. I'm not surprised no one's noticed yet. For one thing, it's only been in a single release of GDB so far - very few people even know about it yet. And I use attach with gdbserver probably only 2% as often as I use it to start programs directly. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery