From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19061 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2007 18:32:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 19051 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Feb 2007 18:32:00 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:31:52 +0000 Received: from dsl093-172-095.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.93.172.95] helo=caradoc.them.org) by nevyn.them.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HKIjO-0001Mq-Nb; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:31:50 -0500 Received: from drow by caradoc.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HKIjO-0004Z8-FK; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:31:50 -0500 Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 18:32:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Joel Sherrill Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Ralf Corsepius Subject: Re: gdb 6.6 sim/erc32 does not parse -E option Message-ID: <20070222183150.GA17532@caradoc.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Joel Sherrill , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Ralf Corsepius References: <45DDCCAE.9060801@oarcorp.com> <20070222171239.GA13379@caradoc.them.org> <45DDD2C6.4080606@oarcorp.com> <20070222181601.GA16625@caradoc.them.org> <45DDE051.4090103@oarcorp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45DDE051.4090103@oarcorp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-02/txt/msg00279.txt.bz2 On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 12:26:25PM -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > >On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 11:28:38AM -0600, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > >>With this patch, gdb still passes a -E big to sim_open in the erc32 > >>simulator code and there is nothing to parse it at that level. > >> > > > >It shouldn't do that. If it does, please show me a complete GDB > >session. > > > > > I double checked that the patch is applied and > had made clean before the last email. Here is > the user's view: Oh sorry for making you run around in circles. I knew I needed to fix something, that's why I hadn't applied it yet. It was pointed out that it needs: - if (target_byte_order_user) + if (target_byte_order_user != BFD_ENDIAN_UNKNOWN) That ought to help! -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery