From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8771 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2007 15:21:39 -0000 Received: (qmail 8757 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Feb 2007 15:21:38 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtagate7.de.ibm.com (HELO mtagate7.de.ibm.com) (195.212.29.156) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:21:32 +0000 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate7.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l1MFLTm2030796 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:21:29 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.2) with ESMTP id l1MFLSuT1318956 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:21:28 +0100 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l1MFLSiB013675 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:21:28 +0100 Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.85.9]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id l1MFLSBQ013672; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:21:28 +0100 Message-Id: <200702221521.l1MFLSBQ013672@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Received: by tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:21:28 +0100 Subject: Re: Patch: Add arch_string to spu-low.c To: drow@false.org (Daniel Jacobowitz) Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 15:21:00 -0000 From: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: deuling@de.ibm.com (Markus Deuling), gdb-patches@sourceware.org (GDB Patches) In-Reply-To: <20070222145603.GB2036@caradoc.them.org> from "Daniel Jacobowitz" at Feb 22, 2007 09:56:03 AM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-02/txt/msg00267.txt.bz2 Daniel Jakowobitz wrote: > OK if it's OK with Ulrich (do you always want "SPU:256K"? Just "spu" > should work too). Can you elaborate on what effect that change would have? Does it then try to automatically select the subarchitecture? (We just have the one right now anyway ...) Markus, can you prepare and test a patch with just "spu" here? Thanks, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com