From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18165 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2007 19:44:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 18152 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Feb 2007 19:44:06 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nile.gnat.com (HELO nile.gnat.com) (205.232.38.5) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:44:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41B7948CE5C for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:43:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from nile.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nile.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 06209-01-10 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:43:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from takamaka.act-europe.fr (unknown [70.71.0.212]) by nile.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC5348CC0D for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 14:43:57 -0500 (EST) Received: by takamaka.act-europe.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4920234C099; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 11:45:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 19:44:00 -0000 From: Joel Brobecker To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix build failure with old versions of expat Message-ID: <20070220194505.GA15797@adacore.com> References: <20070220193009.GO29202@adacore.com> <20070220193746.GA15402@caradoc.them.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070220193746.GA15402@caradoc.them.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-02/txt/msg00250.txt.bz2 > > 2007-02-20 Joel Brobecker > > > > * gdb_expat.h (XMLCALL): Define if not already defined. > > > > Tested on 2 different x86-linux machines: One that does have a recent > > libexpat, and another that has an older one. > > > > OK to apply? > > Yes thanks. Thanks! Checked in. > Sorry, I think I was supposed to take care of this for Denis too... No worries as far as I am concerned. I have been planning on looking at this for a while too. We share the code, we share the work :-). -- Joel