From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2445 invoked by alias); 9 Feb 2007 17:42:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 2403 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Feb 2007 17:42:39 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 17:42:34 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HFZlV-0004pv-PC; Fri, 09 Feb 2007 12:42:29 -0500 Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2007 17:42:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: DJ Delorie , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, newlib@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Updating top-level autoconf to 2.59 Message-ID: <20070209174229.GA18533@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" , DJ Delorie , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, newlib@sourceware.org References: <20070207193352.GA13757@nevyn.them.org> <20070208222020.GA2267@nevyn.them.org> <200702082254.l18MsOuR028641@greed.delorie.com> <20070209151558.GA7193@nevyn.them.org> <20070209153841.GA12038@nevyn.them.org> <20070209161658.GA13966@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-02/txt/msg00134.txt.bz2 On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 05:39:27PM +0000, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > Sure -- I use a script like this for regenerating all the scripts: That's not what I meant. There's just too many cases that need to be tested. Anyway, you're welcome to do it now that the top level has moved up :-) I'm out of time for the moment. > BTW, do we still want to carry local copies of severely obsolete libtool > scripts? I have had success with libtool 1.5.22 and GCC 4.1.1 after a > moderate amount of work (mostly shuffling bits around; libjava/ was the > most involving part) -- if there is interest in upgrading (which might > help some people with less common configurations) I could port them to the > trunk sooner rather than later. I believe the plan was to upgrade top level configure first, then libtool and automake (I don't remember if they were supposed to be done together or in a particular order). Definitely I want to remove the libtool fork. But talk about a change needing a lot of testing... Your patches would definitely be welcome. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery