From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14963 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2007 16:41:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 14942 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Feb 2007 16:41:17 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 16:41:08 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HFCKV-0003gB-4f; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 11:41:03 -0500 Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 16:41:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Denis PILAT Cc: gdb-patches Subject: Re: [RFC] varobj deletion after the binary has changed Message-ID: <20070208164103.GA13544@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Denis PILAT , gdb-patches References: <20070123124457.GA1600@nevyn.them.org> <45B63A49.4010609@st.com> <45B8E8A8.9040904@st.com> <17849.12231.246980.478169@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20070125232731.GA30178@nevyn.them.org> <45BDEAEC.1050006@st.com> <17854.28971.170898.231523@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <45C0B042.9040308@st.com> <17857.2617.164646.935952@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <45C1B78C.60605@st.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45C1B78C.60605@st.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-02/txt/msg00085.txt.bz2 On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 10:49:00AM +0100, Denis PILAT wrote: > Anyway thanks for your comments, I'll take them into account once you've > tested the test and once Daniel gives me a feedback about the C part of > the patch. The C seems reasonable to me; though let's not check it in until we have a documentation update to go with it, if possible. How about under the -var-update section, by the example which uses in_scope="true"? -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery