From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4610 invoked by alias); 31 Jan 2007 15:10:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 4599 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Jan 2007 15:10:09 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:10:04 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HCH61-0006h4-5b for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:10:01 -0500 Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 15:10:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Testsuite failures in gdb.base/callfuncs.exp Message-ID: <20070131151001.GA25714@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20070131124926.GA18380@nevyn.them.org> <20070131141530.GA22362@nevyn.them.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00610.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 03:56:57PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz writes: > > > On Wed, Jan 31, 2007 at 02:56:16PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: > >> bsp can only be modified by writing to bspstore, which is what the kernel > >> does behind our back. gdb itself never writes to bspstore. Thus the > >> value of bspstore does not really matter. > > > > Could we restore it if we tried? > > Why would we want to? I don't know. To leave the inferior's state as untouched as possible after an artificial function call. If you're convinced that's not useful, patch is OK. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery