From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9725 invoked by alias); 29 Jan 2007 16:38:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 9717 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Jan 2007 16:38:49 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:38:43 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HBZWj-0001Gq-6H for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:38:41 -0500 Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 16:38:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Testsuite failure in gdb.cp/annota2.exp Message-ID: <20070129163841.GA4681@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00584.txt.bz2 On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 04:17:52PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote: > The test "watch triggered on a.x" fails on ia64 because it only allows 3 > or 4 occurences of "frames-invalid", but I get 6 of them. What is the > significance of the "frames-invalid" annotation? As Nick said, this comes from flush_cached_frames. I bet we get one each hardware single step, and you've just got more instructions on that source line than the test expects. > 2007-01-26 Andreas Schwab > > * gdb.cp/annota2.exp ("watch triggered on a.x"): Allow arbitrary > amounts of "frames-invalid" annotations. OK. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery