Re: [ob] Adjust member pointer test for g++ 3.3

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>]

On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 06:50:05PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Hmm... how much of a hack do you think it's worth? :-)  It's definitely
> > possible.
> > 
> > The problem is that this is a perfectly legitimate piece of debug
> > output, describing "int A::**" instead of "int A::*".  We could
> > recognize this problem based on string matching the DW_AT_producer;
> > I have added precedents for that before.  I don't see any other way
> > of doing it.
> 
> I don't really care; ok if I xfail those tests for GCC 3.3.x?  3.4.x
> seems to be fine.  Did you test things on some other GCC versions?

That's fine with me.  I believe I tested a 3.4.x gcc and a 4.1.x.

> Oops, for some reason I thought this was a new test.  Anyway, the
> failure modes are probably completely different after your code
> changes, so removing them is probably the most sensible thing to do.

It actually was originally an HP aCC test.  You're right - I should
delete the kfails, although I have honestly no idea what the test will
do for stabs.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery