Re: [RFC] Prints the frame id when target stops

[Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>]

> From: Vladimir Prus <ghost@cs.msu.su>
> Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 02:34:34 +0300
> 
> On Wednesday 17 January 2007 00:12, Nick Roberts wrote:
> >  > > We'd like to avoid refreshing the thread and the frame view when the user
> >  > > perform a step (or a next) and when the program stops in the same thread
> >  > > and in the same frame.  In the stop reason we got the current thread id,
> >  > > but we are missing something to identify the frame.  That patch lets gdb
> >  > > emits on the MI output a string that could be used to easily identify the
> >  > > current frame.  If you are ok with this approach then I'll update the
> >  > > testsuite.
> >  > 
> >  > Would not a better approach be to modify -stack-list-frames and friends,
> >  > so that they check frame id internally, and it has not changed, just
> >  > return the same result? Such approach will uniformly help all frontends,
> >  > and won't expose new concepts in the interface.
> > 
> > It would change the behviour of those commands but I guess it could be added
> > as an option.  
> 
> It actually won't. If -stack-list-frames is changed to return cached
> result when it's absolutely clear that the stack did not change, you
> have no behaviour change, just better performance.

Unforunately, making absolutely sure the stack did not change may not
be possible.

Mark