On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:40:28 +0100, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
...
> I was thinking of this:
>   http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2004-12/msg00249.html
>   http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2005-06/msg00242.html
> 
> I think someone needs to combine Joel's and Jan's patches.  Joel's is
> nicer in that it uses branch_dest and the right mask for blrl; Jan's
> is nicer in that it checks whether lr was saved or is now lost.

Attached for:
	http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2004-12/msg00249.html
and it does not handle in any way
	http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2005-06/msg00242.html
as it would be IMO more appropriate to base it on the called code content but
"I do not have that Darwin code".



Regards,
Jan