From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14554 invoked by alias); 13 Jan 2007 18:26:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 14546 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jan 2007 18:26:51 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mtagate4.de.ibm.com (HELO mtagate4.de.ibm.com) (195.212.29.153) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 18:26:39 +0000 Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate4.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0DIQX17087356 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 18:26:36 GMT Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.228]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.2) with ESMTP id l0DIQWSm2793724 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:26:32 +0100 Received: from d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l0DIQW2U030946 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:26:32 +0100 Received: from tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.85.9]) by d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id l0DIQWpZ030941; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:26:32 +0100 Message-Id: <200701131826.l0DIQWpZ030941@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> Received: by tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 13 Jan 2007 19:26:31 +0100 Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix {get|put}_frame_register_bytes To: mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl (Mark Kettenis) Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 18:26:00 -0000 From: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: uweigand@de.ibm.de, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <200701131731.l0DHV9cV031712@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> from "Mark Kettenis" at Jan 13, 2007 06:31:09 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00339.txt.bz2 Mark Kettenis wrote: > Looks like there's a bug in the new get_frame_register_bytes() and > put_frame_register_bytes(). I suppose the patch below is what you > intended. Oops, indeed. Thanks for catching this! > ok? Yes, of course. Bye, Ulrich -- Dr. Ulrich Weigand GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com