> Ah wait, that's true even for "absolute" code.  I had a quick look at
> the GCC code and it seems to always treat %ebx as callee-saved.  So
> I'm happy with leaving it out, but you could add a comment saying so
> to prevent us from having this same discussion in about two months
> ;-).

Sure! How does the attached patch look? Does it contain enough info?

2007-01-05  Joel Brobecker  <brobecker@adacore.com>

        * i386-tdep.c (i386_analyze_stack_align): Add comment.

-- 
Joel