From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13244 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2007 22:29:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 13217 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jan 2007 22:29:01 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:28:56 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H2EbO-00070c-1h; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 17:28:54 -0500 Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:29:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch RFC] Re: Notes on a frame_unwind_address_in_block problem Message-ID: <20070103222853.GA26905@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20070101191927.GA14930@nevyn.them.org> <200701011954.l01Js85r031019@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070101200248.GA19073@nevyn.them.org> <200701031137.l03Bb0rT031898@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070103161257.GA14162@nevyn.them.org> <200701032027.l03KRv4h000275@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070103203007.GA23392@nevyn.them.org> <200701032158.l03LwPeq026191@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070103220223.GK17935@nevyn.them.org> <200701032223.l03MN8u0001386@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200701032223.l03MN8u0001386@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00087.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 11:23:08PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Hmm, well, you need to commit that one first, because the > frame_func_unwind() change will depend on it. > > But perhaps we should give people a few days to comment... There's a call to frame_unwind_address_in_block in frame_func_unwind, so this is circular - got to break the loop one way or another. It will be simpler if I do both; once I've admitted it's got to be done, the mechanical change won't take but a few minutes. I'll take care of it (but not today). -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery