From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-46936-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 8728 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2007 22:23:23 -0000
Received: (qmail 8720 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jan 2007 22:23:23 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:23:18 +0000
Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l03MN810006439; 	Wed, 3 Jan 2007 23:23:08 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l03MN8u0001386; 	Wed, 3 Jan 2007 23:23:08 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 22:23:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200701032223.l03MN8u0001386@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: drow@false.org
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20070103220223.GK17935@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel 	Jacobowitz on Wed, 3 Jan 2007 17:02:24 -0500)
Subject: Re: [patch RFC] Re: Notes on a frame_unwind_address_in_block problem
References: <200607132020.k6DKKCSB023812@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20060718183910.GB17864@nevyn.them.org> <20070101191927.GA14930@nevyn.them.org> <200701011954.l01Js85r031019@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070101200248.GA19073@nevyn.them.org> <200701031137.l03Bb0rT031898@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070103161257.GA14162@nevyn.them.org> <200701032027.l03KRv4h000275@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070103203007.GA23392@nevyn.them.org> <200701032158.l03LwPeq026191@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070103220223.GK17935@nevyn.them.org>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00085.txt.bz2

> Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 17:02:24 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> 
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 10:58:25PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Heh, well, if you do the mechanical frame_unwind_address_in_block()
> > changes I'll do frame_func_unwind().
> > 
> > After that we can actually worry about about fixing things.
> > 
> > Deal?
> 
> Absolutely.  If you can hand me a patch which adds NORMAL_FRAME to
> every call to frame_func_unwind, I'll do all the rest.  I'm pretty
> sure all of the existing call sites are NORMAL_FRAME; there won't be a
> SIGTRAMP_FRAME one until we split out two this_id functions for dwarf2.
> 
> I've got frame_unwind_address_in_block done locally.

Hmm, well, you need to commit that one first, because the
frame_func_unwind() change will depend on it.

But perhaps we should give people a few days to comment...

Mark