From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15271 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2007 21:07:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 15191 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jan 2007 21:07:09 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:07:05 +0000 Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l03L6tc7005384; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 22:06:55 +0100 (CET) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l03L6t4H025347; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 22:06:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:07:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200701032106.l03L6t4H025347@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> From: Mark Kettenis To: drow@false.org CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <20070103184321.GE17935@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel Jacobowitz on Wed, 3 Jan 2007 13:43:21 -0500) Subject: Re: Get rid of arm_linux_extract_return_value References: <200701011133.l01BX8vG029783@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070103184321.GE17935@nevyn.them.org> Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00078.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 13:43:21 -0500 > From: Daniel Jacobowitz > > On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 12:33:09PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > > Can someone with access to a Linux ARM platform please test this? > > > > I'm considering to just commit this in two weeks if nobody does. I > > mean, come on, there are at least a couple of commercial entities that > > rely on this code, and nobody has body to clean it up anywhere in the > > last four years. > > If part of that was aimed my direction, we actually don't - this is > strictly old ABI code, and we only work with the EABI nowadays. > And in fact don't have handy test configurations for the old ABI, > which is how I never got around to it. This prompted me to set one > up though. Yes, Codesourcery was one of the entities I had in mind. Thanks for doing this! > > Index: ChangeLog > > from Mark Kettenis > > > > * arm-linux-tdep.c (arm_linux_extract_return_value): Remove. > > (arm_linux_init_abi): Don't set deprecated_extract_return_value. Committed. Mark