From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-46928-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 1140 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2007 20:38:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 1129 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jan 2007 20:38:33 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:38:24 +0000
Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l03Kc9pF022011; 	Wed, 3 Jan 2007 21:38:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l03Kc9KG023052; 	Wed, 3 Jan 2007 21:38:09 +0100 (CET)
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:38:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200701032038.l03Kc9KG023052@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: drow@false.org
CC: eliz@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20070103191225.GH17935@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel 	Jacobowitz on Wed, 3 Jan 2007 14:12:25 -0500)
Subject: Re: RFC: Use -Wall -Wextra
References: <20061228195533.GA18492@nevyn.them.org> <uzm963noj.fsf@gnu.org> <20061229135814.GA9741@nevyn.them.org> <usley300m.fsf@gnu.org> <20061229210206.GA23681@nevyn.them.org> <uhcvd2yd1.fsf@gnu.org> <20061230160034.GE15107@nevyn.them.org> <20070103191225.GH17935@nevyn.them.org>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00077.txt.bz2

> Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 14:12:25 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> 
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 11:00:34AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > Anyway, let's go with -Wall; that's still an improvement over the
> > present state and fixes the annoying -Wuninitialized warnings.  I'll
> > commit my saved up warning fixes, and then post a patch to do this.
> 
> Here's what I have just tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.  This is a much
> more conservative patch than my previous one.  It may still break other
> targets, especially native ones, with -Werror; I'll be happy to help
> fix any breakage if the fixes aren't apparent.
> 
> OK to commit?

Fine with me.