From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30879 invoked by alias); 3 Jan 2007 20:30:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 30871 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Jan 2007 20:30:15 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:30:09 +0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H2CkR-00065y-4x; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 15:30:07 -0500 Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 20:30:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: Mark Kettenis Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch RFC] Re: Notes on a frame_unwind_address_in_block problem Message-ID: <20070103203007.GA23392@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sourceware.org References: <20060706222157.GA1377@nevyn.them.org> <200607132020.k6DKKCSB023812@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20060718183910.GB17864@nevyn.them.org> <20070101191927.GA14930@nevyn.them.org> <200701011954.l01Js85r031019@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070101200248.GA19073@nevyn.them.org> <200701031137.l03Bb0rT031898@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070103161257.GA14162@nevyn.them.org> <200701032027.l03KRv4h000275@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200701032027.l03KRv4h000275@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00076.txt.bz2 On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 09:27:57PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: > Oh sorry Daniel, I thought it was obvious that frame_func_unwind() > needed the same treatment as frame_unwind_address_in_block(). Bother, 55 call sites in 37 files. Well, if you think this is the right change, I'll do it in a bit. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery