From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-46906-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 28147 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2007 19:22:26 -0000
Received: (qmail 28138 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Jan 2007 19:22:25 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 19:22:20 +0000
Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l02JMDrl019597; 	Tue, 2 Jan 2007 20:22:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l02JMDTc013928; 	Tue, 2 Jan 2007 20:22:13 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 19:22:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200701021922.l02JMDTc013928@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: brobecker@adacore.com
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20070102052456.GE17211@adacore.com> (message from Joel Brobecker 	on Tue, 2 Jan 2007 09:24:56 +0400)
Subject: Re: [RFC] Return value cleanup in rs6000-tdep.c
References: <200701011746.l01HkAT8016192@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070102052456.GE17211@adacore.com>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00055.txt.bz2

> Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 09:24:56 +0400
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> 
> The planets must be in the right alignment. The testsuite took way less
> time to complete than the actual build. Here are the only differences
> (before and after):
> 
> * gdb.base:
> +------------+------------+----------------------------------------------------+
> |       FAIL | PASS       | call-sc.exp: value foo returned; return call-sc-tc |
> |       FAIL | PASS       | call-sc.exp: value foo returned; return call-sc-ts |
> |       FAIL | PASS       | call-sc.exp: value foo returned; return call-sc-tf |
> |       FAIL | PASS       | return2.exp: char value returned successfully      |
> |       FAIL | PASS       | return2.exp: short value returned successfully     |
> |       FAIL | PASS       | return2.exp: validate result value not equal t ... |
> |            |            | ... o program return value                         |
> |       FAIL | PASS       | return2.exp: float value returned successfully     |
> +------------+------------+----------------------------------------------------+
> 

Ha, so I even fixed some bugs.  Committed.