From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-46905-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 26215 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2007 19:20:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 26207 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Jan 2007 19:20:33 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from nevyn.them.org (HELO nevyn.them.org) (66.93.172.17)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31.1) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 19:20:25 +0000
Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 4.63) 	(envelope-from <drow@nevyn.them.org>) 	id 1H1pBP-00052A-6d; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 14:20:23 -0500
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 19:20:00 -0000
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
Subject: Re: [patch RFC] Re: Notes on a frame_unwind_address_in_block problem
Message-ID: <20070102192023.GA19330@nevyn.them.org>
Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, 	Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
References: <200607132020.k6DKKCSB023812@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20060718183910.GB17864@nevyn.them.org> <20070101191927.GA14930@nevyn.them.org> <200701011954.l01Js85r031019@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070101200248.GA19073@nevyn.them.org> <200701012026.l01KQj6h022478@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070101203533.GA20094@nevyn.them.org> <20070102005055.GA26703@nevyn.them.org> <200701021916.l02JGE0b027636@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070102191807.GA19169@nevyn.them.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070102191807.GA19169@nevyn.them.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00054.txt.bz2

On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 02:18:07PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Do you think it's worth my hand-writing the necessary CFI so that you
> can try it?

Alternatively, many native GCC configurations will use whichever
version of gas is in your $PATH; you can build and install it somewhere
else.  Don't try this with a version older than your GCC was configured
with, but newer should be fine.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery