From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-46903-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 25085 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2007 19:16:33 -0000
Received: (qmail 25077 invoked by uid 22791); 2 Jan 2007 19:16:33 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from sibelius.xs4all.nl (HELO brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl) (82.92.89.47)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Jan 2007 19:16:25 +0000
Received: from brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (kettenis@localhost.sibelius.xs4all.nl [127.0.0.1]) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l02JGF1k019140; 	Tue, 2 Jan 2007 20:16:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from kettenis@localhost) 	by brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l02JGE0b027636; 	Tue, 2 Jan 2007 20:16:15 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 19:16:00 -0000
Message-Id: <200701021916.l02JGE0b027636@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl>
From: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>
To: drow@false.org
CC: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-reply-to: <20070102005055.GA26703@nevyn.them.org> (message from Daniel 	Jacobowitz on Mon, 1 Jan 2007 19:50:55 -0500)
Subject: Re: [patch RFC] Re: Notes on a frame_unwind_address_in_block problem
References: <20060706222157.GA1377@nevyn.them.org> <200607132020.k6DKKCSB023812@elgar.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20060718183910.GB17864@nevyn.them.org> <20070101191927.GA14930@nevyn.them.org> <200701011954.l01Js85r031019@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070101200248.GA19073@nevyn.them.org> <200701012026.l01KQj6h022478@brahms.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20070101203533.GA20094@nevyn.them.org> <20070102005055.GA26703@nevyn.them.org>
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2007-01/txt/msg00052.txt.bz2

> Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 19:50:55 -0500
> From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> 
> On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 03:35:33PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > Hmm, sorry yes, a test that would work on all i386 or x86-64 target
> > > was what I actually meant.
> > 
> > I can probably do that.  I'll try this evening.
> 
> Here you go.  It requires binutils 2.17 or later; before committing it
> I would have to make sure it's quiet with an older version.  I could
> write it without the binutils dependency, but it's a lot bigger and
> messier that way.

Thanks.  Unfortunately I don't seem to have a system around with
binutils 2.17 :(  Well, time will probably solve that problem...